"Frank, you must be jealous of us in order to make such remarks like that"
Jealous of what? And remarks like what (which indicate my "jealousy")?
"Some chick (or chicks) must have gotten your sperm and your $$$ and now you want everyone else to be miserable just like you."
I'm not miserable. I enjoy myself greatly. I have an opinion, seemingly opinions that differ from others. Why should that bother me or you?
"Do yourself a favor, stick to topics that you know."
So you think I am mistaken in believing that one never risks unwanted pregnancy by simply not having sex with the person one wishes to guarantee one will not impregnate? You think it's bad advice to avoid promiscuity? Huh.
A guy reports the woman he has been sleeping with says she is pregnant. He states: "This cant be, I've always wore a condom AND she was on birth control." Responses here include: Ă¯Â¿Â½you can't trust a woman to take BC pillsĂ¯Â¿Â½ and Ă¯Â¿Â½she very well could have stopped taking her BC pillsĂ¯Â¿Â½
Those remarks don't indicate that she could not have become pregnant except by ceasing to take birth control?
Another thing I know about is how to read.
I based my perception of the OP solely on his posts. As stated above, I can read. Your opinion of this fellow differs. I don't think any of you are stupid or miserable because you disagree with me.
There are plenty of people here and other forums to maintain mutual masturbation societies where everyone agrees and thinks everything someone else says or does is nice or fun or clever or worthy of sympathy. Good for you. You don't me to do additional stroking.
Here's a nice, fun and clever idea: if you dislike or disagree with my opinions, make a substantive argument as to why they are insupportable. Of course, as I have done in this post and in the past, I will attempt to counter your criticisms and support my remarks. After that you can go back to posting your personal opinions of me as miserable or somehow jealous or simply as someone who doesn't know what is being said. Or, you might actually contrive to continue a discussion without the ad hominem input, though I don't really expect that.
Last edited by FrankJBN; 04/10/08 11:31 AM.