Folks,
apologies for the fact that I sometimes can't get on the forum for a few days.
Patience, thanks so much for that insight into DID. I suspected your original point was not too serious but nonetheless from a philosophical point of view it certainly does raise some interesting questions about personal identity. For example, might it be possible for the child to split before birth due to some trauma in the womb and if so who would the primary or original person be then? And even without any splitting of personalities, just when do we become who we are? Can we pinpoint that at all?
Conversely, what about Siamese twins who share some brain functions and seem to have only one personality between them? (I don't actually know if this physically possible so keep me right if I'm talking bollo.... nonsense.) Would we say that although there are two bodies there is only one person, or how would we describe this?
Alexandra, yup I'm with you on the "god in man's image" analysis. These days I tend to see religion very much in a sociological context. A social system created or evolving because it was useful. But that's a whole different debate.
On the Buddhist teachings regarding emptiness, a couple of years ago here at Samye Ling I sat in on parts of a course taught by, I think, Khenpo Tsultrim Gyamtso Rinpoche and found myself being reminded of The Meditations of Rene Descartes.
You can probably guess I'm quite hard nosed when it comes to questions about the existence of the physical world but it never does any harm to question things. I wasn't convinced by the conclusion that material objects are illusory - if walls don't exist why do Lama's always use the door? :o) - but the point that our perceptions are only one of many possible perspectives is a truly important point to remember.
Finally das, the argument above about not surviving after death was not meant to catch you out or score points over you, but I think you know that okay. Like Alexandra I just love exploring the paths where logic leads.
All the best to you all,
Chik