What I am saying is that the Gnostic texts present a very different picture of Jesus than the Biblical texts. There are a lot of similarities, but there are also very significant differences. The Gnostic texts also present a very different picture of the God of the Hebrews.
So, in essence we are looking at the same stories, only from a different angle. Why would the Bible be any more correct on the subject of God and Jesus than the Gnostic texts would be?
But, if you look carefully at Gnostic belief and the principle of emanations.. it is reflected throughout the entire bible!
So, interpretation is everything. Looking at the bible from a Gnostic or Sumerian point of veiw you start to see a different interpretation is possible.
So, if you are relying on literal interpretation of the bible regarding Christadelphians, which literal interpretation are you talking about?