I think i'm getting less tolerant, but believe it has a lot to do with the way kids are parented today.
<snip>
I guess that my intolerance is directed more at the parents than the kids. After all, parents are the role-models and adults in charge.
Sorry, went off on a bit of a tangent there.. But silly breeder parents drive me crazy.
Human survival and civilization has depended on 'silly breeder parents' for an exceedingly large number of generations.
I'm almost certain that parents pressuring adult children to have their own kids is a deepseated instinct for vengeance. I base this on my own experience, of course - I called the folks to get sympathy for the stages my children were passing through and was puzzled by the response 'maybe they'll call you in 30 years and apologize.'
I was the best behaved, sweetest child of all my siblings and cousins! And then I remembered - vaguely - some conflicts, and my response would have been 'but I was entirely justified...' or 'but I was *right* and you were...' oops.
So I told them I was sorry if I put them through anything like my children ... and through their laughter I heard one of them say 'She said, IF!!'
So now I wonder about my mom saying she hoped I someday had a daughter just like me. Was that a vicious remark? I just don't know.
What I notice about children today is how unexpected it is for them to have one to one conversation with an adult for a few minutes. I wonder if they have five minutes alone with any adult who is interested in them for those few moments.
I know that behavior specialists who work with children who have disabilities tell us 'all behavior is communication.' Children with language impairments misbehave when they are frustrated, when they have pain or illness they can't communicate, and have developed habits where they have not been offered alternate means of communication like sign language or picture cards.
Children with disabilitie who are offered sign language instruction and graphic communication cards or electronics misbehave when 'listeners' are not included in their program. Even the best alternate forms of communication need an interested and responsive receiver.
The folks who put together the 'Baby Sign' books for mainstream children comment that signing babies develop better temperaments when they can communicate before their ability to form words and sentences develops.
When I see mainstream children misbehaving in public, I think that what they lack is a careful, interested listener. Of course, they also need a clue about how to behaver and communicate in a civilized way, an understanding of natural consequences, and eventually the concept of respect and consideration for others.
I have to admit I find the tv show, The SuperNanny, fascinating. It seems as though children are not just raising themselves and one another out in public, they are not getting any kind of clue or support for self control at home, either.
Something that surprised me when I observed a preschool when my children were very young was the effect a staff member had on an out of control child in the classroom. She told him, "I won't let you hurt other children, and I won't let other children hurt you." He seemed stunned to hear that she would protect him as she protected the other rascals.
I have less patience with children than when I was young, but I was always interested in babies and young children, and looked forward to having a family very much, so I have more patience now than many people I know.
I can't tell how much less tolerant I am of children misbehaving in public, because I am often out with friends, one or two of whom have used up all their patience with specific children in their lives.
I sometimes feel I might have to throw myself between a fussy child or whining two year old and certain of my friends, to prevent their piercing glares from causing the child to spontaneously combust.
When my children seem shocked at the behavior of two year olds melting down in public, I confidently assure them that neither of them was every that age. When they are not with me, I tell mothers of young children who are out of control that neither my son or daughter was ever that age.
During college I worked at an organization that sought to reduce child abuse by befriending parents and providing information, support and respite services. Some moms would call to say they were afraid they were going to hurt their babies or toddlers, who of course are totally dependent and always more demanding than expected.
So I figure in some cases, what's needed is a stranger walking up to say 'children can be overwhelming, so it's lucky we moms are superhuman most of the time.'
I never know when the moms at the library who let their children run wild are there because if they stayed at home, their children might not be safe, or they might just to too overwhelmed to see past the next few moments.
I know we are talking about 'parents who let their children run wild' but when we see a mom with wild kids, we never think of the father being that parent by not being around to give the mom a break.
Even moms who hoped and dreamed all their lives of the time they would have their own children never realized that each child is a complicated 24/7 needy sponge. Of course I mean that in a good way.
So, if no one is around to take responsibility for the child for an hour a week so a mom can meet a friend for lunch, paint her nails, make a cup of tea, or take a walk, maybe they take their children with them somewhere just so they can get out into the world.
So we should replace all references to the word 'parent' with 'dads' because the person who usually takes all the responsibility is the one who gets all the blame, and to most of us, 'parent' means the mom, when children are out of control. Being absent certainly is not good parenting. Being there but temporarily unavailable might be.
OK, I have now officially decided to switch to decaf.
Pam W
SE of Seattle