<<if you're using the original Bible>>
Rome does not approve of sola scriptura. Christ entrusted the deposit of faith to the Teaching Authority of His Church and not to any individual's personal interpretation of the Sacred Scriptures.
It is also true that theologians must always return to the sources of divine revelation: for it belongs to them to point out how the doctrine of the living Teaching Authority is to be found either explicitly or implicitly in the Scriptures and in Tradition. Besides, each source of divinely revealed doctrine contains so many rich treasures of truth, that they can really never be exhausted. Hence it is that theology through the study of its sacred sources remains ever fresh; on the other hand, speculation which neglects a deeper search into the deposit of faith, proves sterile, as we know from experience. But for this reason even positive theology cannot be on a par with merely historical science. For, together with the sources of positive theology God has given to His Church a living Teaching Authority to elucidate and explain what is contained in the deposit of faith only obscurely and implicitly. This deposit of faith our Divine Redeemer has given for authentic interpretation not to each of the faithful, not even to theologians, but only to the Teaching Authority of the Church.
<<Not to mention, the whole "judge not" thing>>
I assume you are referring to the federal jugheads who made erroneous judgements to legalize the slaughtering of innocent unborn children as well as those who have been deemed by them not to have a quality of life worth living?
