logo
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
#113675 06/01/04 10:19 PM
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 4
Claud Offline OP
Newbie
OP Offline
Newbie
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 4

Sponsored Post Advertisement
#113676 06/01/04 11:20 PM
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 67
Amoeba
Offline
Amoeba
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 67
Do you know who is sponsoring this bill? Is now the time to write to our representatives about this?

Karen
Adoption Host

#113677 06/01/04 11:31 PM
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 67
Amoeba
Offline
Amoeba
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 67
The main purposes of this bill are simple:
Open adoption records for adults
Legalize and enforce open agreements.
Federal regulation of agencies and other aoption professionals
Ensure that relinquishing parents have full information regarding the possible long term effects of adoption, are treated with respect and have all the necessary chances to parent their children if they so what.

#113678 06/01/04 11:34 PM
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 67
Amoeba
Offline
Amoeba
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 67
I think this act has some major problems, especially making open adoption legal contracts. Read the most recent Bella Adoption article for potential problems such legislation could present. In essence, this would be giving government the authority to rule the lives of all families touched by adoption.

Adopted Mom

#113679 06/02/04 10:37 PM
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 4
Claud Offline OP
Newbie
OP Offline
Newbie
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 4
Actually, the way I see it...having legal open contracts would be no different than a visitation agreement regarding divorce. You work out a plan that works for all parties, BUT you have to stick to it. If you have reason to change it, then you need to do it legally, not on a whim.
What concerns me is the number of adoptions that go through with promises to the birthmother for letters and info and visists...and then the adoption starts to close often due to the fact that they were empty promises and were made with no intention of keeping them, or in the hopes that the birthmother would just go away in time..and when she doesn't...
If apaps have a real reson to close an adoption...like safty of the child fine...then they should habe no problem going before a governing body and proving that...and if they just take off, well, then the birthmother has the ability to do more about it besides cry and ripp out her hair. It's equallizing the power.
Its making people stay honest....if a couple has no intention of wanting an open adoption, but the birthmother who picks them does, well...they can't just play her along...there will be reprocussions. They need to find a birthmother who thinks like they do.
And please, if you have input...join in.
There is no one sponsering this bill yet...I just made it up.
It needs fine tuning so that it will make sense to those it could effect....so be specific about what you would like to see happen.
It needs to happen in some regard...and hopefully it will.

#113680 06/03/04 05:18 PM
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 67
Amoeba
Offline
Amoeba
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 67
While I see your point about hopeful aparents making empty promises to birth moms, the bottom line remains that once a b/parent signs those relinquishment papers, his/her rights are terminated. Open adoption is NOT co-parenting. Rather, it is both families sharing bits of their lives with one another.

I just don't think it's fair to legally force my pre-teen to talk with his birth mom when, for whatever reason, he doesn't feel like talking with her that day. At the same time, I don't think his b/mom should be expected to drop everything in her busy family life to make a phone call at a specified time.

As for having to go through the court system to protect my child from a visitations by a criminal birth parent, that's absurd! As his legal parent, I, not the courts, should be the one to decide what's best for my child's safety! Getting court dates takes time, and then there's the burden of proof thing, not to mention the costs involved. The way I see it, having to go to court every time an a/parent, adoptee, or b/parent wants to change any part of the open agreement, would needlessly clog up an already overburdened court system, and the only advantage would be to further pad the pocketbooks of the attorneys involved.

Adoption Host


Moderated by  Deanna - Adoption Editor 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Brand New Posts
Sewing Pattern Mysteries
by Cheryl - Sewing Editor - 08/06/25 01:47 PM
Canadian Film "The Auction" - New Review
by Angela - Drama Movies - 08/02/25 03:15 PM
Easy Sewing Projects for Beginning Sewers
by Cheryl - Sewing Editor - 07/31/25 10:38 AM
Lining Pocket Surprise
by Cheryl - Sewing Editor - 07/23/25 05:45 PM
Psalm for the day
by Angie - 07/22/25 07:26 PM
"Mother of Mine" - WWII Drama from Finland
by Angela - Drama Movies - 07/20/25 12:48 AM
Cinema Nomad - New Show for World Cinema Lovers
by Angela - Drama Movies - 07/20/25 12:35 AM
Summer Tie-dyeing Options
by Cheryl - Sewing Editor - 07/16/25 02:13 PM
Sponsor
Safety
We take forum safety very seriously here at BellaOnline. Please be sure to read through our Forum Guidelines. Let us know if you have any questions or comments!
Privacy
This forum uses cookies to ensure smooth navigation from page to page of a thread. If you choose to register and provide your email, that email is solely used to get your password to you and updates on any topics you choose to watch. Nothing else. Ask with any questions!


| About BellaOnline | Privacy Policy | Advertising | Become an Editor |
Website copyright © 2022 Minerva WebWorks LLC. All rights reserved.


Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5