Originally posted by daniel_bennett:
[qb] i would hav to go for the ps2 because of the amount of games, the xbox is twice as powerful but the graphics still arnt much better than the ps2 and the gc is ok if ur 6 or 7 but shouldnt b considered by ne1 older than that. [/qb]
I have a GC. I'm older than six or seven. I don't think a six or seven year old would fair to well in MP and the soon to be MP2. I think that the GC would have done better had they not destroyed one of its key series. The Legend of Zelda. They should have enhanced the graphics, instead of just used cel-shading. And, comparably, the GC and XBox far exceed the graphics power of a PS2. I get good use out of my GC. Of course, Nintendo should let 3rd parties publish more, instead of them doing the publishing.
And, answer me this:
How can the XBox not be that much better than a PS2 and a GC graphic-wise when you say that the graphics are twice as good? Think before you hit that little button that says "Add Reply" next time. And maybe edit your message so it's readable. You didn't back up a single thing you said in your message, and you even contradicted yourself while trying to do so.