Slightly OT, but I do want to stand up for new physicians vs older physicians.
The docs that are just coming out of med school and their residencies have just learned THE LATEST in medical discoveries. Although older doctors are supposed to keep up with changes in the medical feid - many don't.
I used to work as a surgical technician. And for a few months worked as a private tech for an Ob/Gyn, that was a much older man - getting ready to hesad into retirement. Everybody that worked in the hospital
hated getting the luck of the draw on him with hysterrectomies, becuase he refused to use the bovie to control bleeding. (Bovie is the little electricla cautery pencil used to cauterize small bleeding vessels.) Instead, he insisted on tying off even the smallest bleedeers with stitches just like other surgeons would normally do for large bleeding vessels.
His reasoning was that he attended Harvard medical school (I got SO sick of hearing that!) - and it had been proven that people did not heal from cauterizing wounds like they did from dissolvable stitches.
The problem was, he had graduated
40 years ago!!! Cautery had completely been revamped, and was safer to use than keeping a woman under anesthesia for 3 hrs as opposed to another surgeons 1 1/2 hours, just because he had to tie off every tiny bleeder instead of cauterizing it.
It is a balance that we all want in a doctor. The young ones have all the newest knowledge and tehniques, the older ones all the experience. But the young ones aren't going to get experience, unless we give them a chance.
My regular doc is about my age (mid 30's), and I was the first person in his office to go through gastric bypass. He did a lot of research on it when he found out I would be going through it, so that he could keep up with what all I might need. His name is Patel, Btw.
