I'm resurrecting this thread due to questions posed by another member, regarding eating meat as a Buddhist, and whether it goes against the precepts...
There is a sutta in which the Buddha explains that killing an animal for food is against the First precept, and is wrong.
Furthermore, dealing in the business of meat is not Right Livelihood, and it is also wrong to request or command, that someone do the killing for you, on your behalf, specifically.
So to Theravadan Buddhists, eating meat offered to you by a householder, who has prepared a meal for you, but has not killed the animal for you specifically, is acceptable.
However:
many Buddhists (and I would say they hail mainly from the Mahayanan tradition) attest that even buying meat indirectly killed, is still wrong, because if you weren't providing a market, the meat would not be killed....
Some argue that the Buddha ate meat, and in fact, died as a result of eating meat, that had gone off...
others claim that the name of the dish is actually misinterpreted, and that the food was actually a mushroom...
many state that it's OK to eat meat, because HH the Dalai Lama does...
It's for sure that he used to, as a result of a hepatitic illness he contracted during his escape from Tibet... and Tibetans, due to the unforgiving terrain, eat meat as a necessity for nutrition, as vegetables are extremely difficult to cultivate, or come by....
Given the enormous diversity of food now available to us, produced both nationally and internationally, AND the great and nutritious availability of meat or protein substitutes (together with herbal and medicinal supplements) there seems little excuse to keep eating meat....
And some people (like me) love it.
Really love it.
But want to give up, and have to do so gradually.
It's my choice, and I have no intention of condemning or criticising anyone, for whatever choices they make, in turn....
Would that some vegetarian Buddhists were so accepting.
But they feel strongly about it.
Discuss.
This could go on and on...