logo
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 228
L
Shark
OP Offline
Shark
L
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 228
I came across this fascinating article.



The Ancient Egyptians built their great Pyramids by pouring concrete into blocks high on the site rather than hauling up giant stones, according to a new Franco-American study. The research, by materials scientists from national institutions, adds fuel to a theory that the pharaohs� craftsmen had enough skill and materials at hand to cast the two-tonne limestone blocks that dress the Cheops and other Pyramids. Despite mounting support from scientists, Egyptologists have rejected the concrete claim, first made in the late 1970s by Joseph Davidovits, a French chemist. The stones, say the historians and archeologists, were all carved from nearby quarries, heaved up huge ramps and set in place by armies of workers. Some dissenters say that levers or pulleys were used, even though the wheel had not been invented at that time. Until recently it was hard for geologists to distinguish between natural limestone and the kind that would have been made by reconstituting liquefied lime. But according to Professor Gilles Hug, of the French National Aerospace Research Agency (Onera), and Professor Michel Barsoum, of Drexel University in Philadelphia, the covering of the great Pyramids at Giza consists of two types of stone: one from the quarries and one man-made. �There�s no way around it. The chemistry is well and truly different,� Professor Hug told Science et Vie magazine. Their study is being published this month in the Journal of the American Ceramic Society.

The pair used X-rays, a plasma torch and electron microscopes to compare small fragments from pyramids with stone from the Toura and Maadi quarries.

They found �traces of a rapid chemical reaction which did not allow natural crystalisation . . . The reaction would be inexplicable if the stones were quarried, but perfectly comprehensible if one accepts that they were cast like concrete.�

The pair believe that the concrete method was used only for the stones on the higher levels of the Pyramids. There are some 2.5 million stone blocks on the Cheops Pyramid. The 10-tonne granite blocks at their heart were also natural, they say. The professors agree with the �Davidovits theory� that soft limestone was quarried on the damp south side of the Giza Plateau. This was then dissolved in large, Nile-fed pools until it became a watery slurry.


"Look beyond the disability, see the perfection of the soul". RJG
Sponsored Post Advertisement
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 175
D
Jellyfish
Offline
Jellyfish
D
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 175
A quick web research indicated that the wheel was invented about 5000BC and the pyramids were built around 3000 BC. So it is most likely that the wheel did exist. Some say that the pyramids are from 10,000 BC, though, which would make it possible that the wheel didn't exist.

Where is your article from?

DJC


www.donnajcarty.co.uk
I welcome comments on my website.
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 228
L
Shark
OP Offline
Shark
L
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 228
I found it on a British website Supernatural World.


"Look beyond the disability, see the perfection of the soul". RJG
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,169
Parakeet
Offline
Parakeet
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,169
I looked into this further, and found the original article in the Times UK from December 1st - http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,13509-2480751,00.html

That is better documented with names, places, and sources. It does say this is just a theory and more and larger samples are needed to prove it. If this is destructive sampling (which it sounds like), I don't know that they will get samples. Apparently the research is being published in this month's Journal of the American Ceramic Society. I asked some engineer friends for input, I'll let you know if I find out anything more of note.

Julie

Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,169
Parakeet
Offline
Parakeet
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,169
Just an update, according to my friend who is a materials engineer; the Journal of the American Ceramic Society is a very reputable journal.


Moderated by  Rachel - Middle East 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Brand New Posts
Astro Women - Birthdays
by Mona - Astronomy - 04/24/24 03:37 PM
2024 - on this day in the past ...
by Mona - Astronomy - 04/24/24 03:33 PM
Check Out My New Website Selective Focus
by Angela - Drama Movies - 04/24/24 01:47 PM
Psalm for the day
by Angie - 04/23/24 04:45 PM
Inspiration Quote
by Angie - 04/23/24 04:43 PM
Sew a Garden Flag
by Cheryl - Sewing Editor - 04/17/24 01:24 PM
Review - Notion for Pattern Designers: Plan, Organ
by Digital Art and Animation - 04/17/24 12:35 AM
Review - Create a Portfolio with Adobe Indesign
by Digital Art and Animation - 04/17/24 12:32 AM
Useful Sewing Tips
by Cheryl - Sewing Editor - 04/10/24 04:55 PM
"Leave Me Alone" New Greta Garbo Documentary
by Angela - Drama Movies - 04/09/24 07:07 PM
Sponsor
Safety
We take forum safety very seriously here at BellaOnline. Please be sure to read through our Forum Guidelines. Let us know if you have any questions or comments!
Privacy
This forum uses cookies to ensure smooth navigation from page to page of a thread. If you choose to register and provide your email, that email is solely used to get your password to you and updates on any topics you choose to watch. Nothing else. Ask with any questions!


| About BellaOnline | Privacy Policy | Advertising | Become an Editor |
Website copyright © 2022 Minerva WebWorks LLC. All rights reserved.


Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5