Ah, ok, yes Philip K Dick claims many inspirations for his writing and undoubtedly that was one of them. Dick was more of a philosopher than most other sci fi writers though, he would have loved the Matrix trilogy with all of its layers and layers and symbols.
I got another copy of Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep last night from Borders, having somehow misplaced my original, and re-read it. I put my notes up on that and Blade Runner here -
http://www.lisashea.com/hobbies/pkdick/bladerunner.html I've somehow also lost my DVD of Blade Runner (methinks I lent both to someone and forgot who) so I'll have to get a new copy of that from Amazon and rewatch it. But my general recollection seems to have been right on - that the book was fantastically layered, and the movie barely scratched the surface of what was discussed and even those few tiny parts it explored it didn't get quite right.
I love Blade Runner as a movie, with its Film Noir atmosphere. I loved all the Sam Spade movies and in essence Blade Runner is a film noir set in the future. But the actual story is about as basic as you can get, something that *any* sci-fi writer could have written. It's the tale of Data from Star Trek. Dick had SO many other layers in his story that were completely abandoned, so they lost the meaning in the translation. I'm happy at least that the movie has convinced thousands of people to go back and read the original story though, which is a story you could easily read once a year and get a new insight out of each time <img src="/images/graemlins/smile.gif" alt="" />