logo

THIS IS THE NEW SERVER - WE ARE STILL TWEAKING IT
Channel List
Beauty & Self
Books & Music
Career
Computers
Education
Family
Food & Wine
Health & Fitness
Hobbies & Crafts
Home & Garden
Money
News & Politics
Relationships
Religion & Spirituality
Sports
Travel & Culture
TV & Movies
Safety
We take forum safety very seriously here at BellaOnline. Please be sure to read through our Forum Guidelines. Let us know if you have any questions or comments!
Newest Members
silkfabric1999, ginamercedez, Kareen122, Whoundle42, knotty lace kid
58067 Registered Users
Forum Stats
58,067 Registered Members
417 Forums
117,022 Topics
832,162 Posts

Most users ever online: 615 @ 04/22/15 10:11 AM
Top Posters (30 Days)
Nancy Roussy 320
Mona - Astronomy 98
Connie - ADD/Sandwiches 58
Lisa LowCarb / VideoGames 56
"Rosie" 48
Deanna - New Age 47
Digital Art and Animation 42
Angie 26
Angela - Drama Movies 22
Michelle - Teen & Reading Editor 21
Ad Income Supports Charity
Topic Options
#767620 - 06/11/12 10:49 AM ADV Countersues FUNimation
Lesley Aeschliman Offline
BellaOnline Editor
Wolf

Registered: 09/19/07
Posts: 5980
Loc: Enumclaw, WA, USA
Crunchyroll is reporting that as part of the lawsuit between FUNimation and ADV over ADV's disoslution and debts, ADV has decided to countersue as a third-party, claiming that FUNimation is trying to monopolize the anime industry through illegal means.

The countersuit was filed in the Harris County Courts on May 8, 2012, as an amended answer, original counterclaim and third-party claim.

The lawsuit specifies FUNimation Entertainment, FUNimation Productions Ltd., AnimeOnline Ltd., FUNimation GP LLC, Anime LP Holdings LLC., FUNimation LP LLC, and FUNimation CEO Gen Fukunaga as the defendants, and seeks judgment in favor of ADV in both the lawsuit and countersuit. In addition, the suit asks that ADV be awarded its "actual, consequential, direct, indirect, and exemplary damages"; attorney's fees, interests and court costs; and "an order enjoining FUNimation from attempting to enforce any rights it claims to have secured from ARM and from obtaining any assets owned by the defendants" of the original suit.

ADV's counterclaim claims nine reasons for the suit:
*violation of the Federal Sherman Act
*violation of the Texas Free Enterprise Act
*Unfair Competition/Misappropriation
*Tortuous Interference with Existing Contract
*Violations of Chapter 9 of the Texas Business and Commerce Code
*Conspiracy to Violate Chapter 9 of the Texas Business and Commerce Code
*Breach of Contract
*Conspiracy to Commit Fraud
*Fraud and Fraudulent Inducement

In addition, since ADV is claiming that the foreclosure sale was unlawful, they also claim that a "sham foreclosure sale" took place.
_________________________
Lesley Aeschliman

Top
#767688 - 06/11/12 03:22 PM Re: ADV Countersues FUNimation [Re: Lesley Aeschliman]
Lesley Aeschliman Offline
BellaOnline Editor
Wolf

Registered: 09/19/07
Posts: 5980
Loc: Enumclaw, WA, USA
Anime News Network is reporting that according to the Office of Harris County, the case was "removed to Federal court" on June 8, 2012, and that the office is currently listing that the case is disposed.

The site is also reporting that FUNimation filed a notice of removal on June 8, 2012 in the third-party claim.
_________________________
Lesley Aeschliman

Top
#767859 - 06/12/12 03:11 PM Re: ADV Countersues FUNimation [Re: Lesley Aeschliman]
Lesley Aeschliman Offline
BellaOnline Editor
Wolf

Registered: 09/19/07
Posts: 5980
Loc: Enumclaw, WA, USA
Anime News Network is reporting that FUNimation provided the site with the following statement in regards to ADV's countersuit:

"We believe these counterclaims are frivolous and will soon be dismissed. Funimation is obviously not a monopoly, has not sought a monopoly, and has never been in violation of any antitrust laws. Rather, these claims were brought in a transparent attempt to gain leverage in the case because the defendants lack any defense to Funimation's original claims."

In addition, Anime News Network is also reporting that FUNimation has confirmed that the case was transferred to the Federal District Court for the Southern District of Texas, Houston Division on June 8, 2012.
_________________________
Lesley Aeschliman

Top


Want to reply? Register as a Forum Member - it's quick, free and fun!
Brand New Posts
What is your stress level today?
by Nancy Roussy
Stress Management
3 seconds ago
Tea Quotes
by mary-tea1
Tea
15 minutes 53 seconds ago
"Green Things" Green Team Member Ideas
by mary-tea1
Tea
22 minutes 27 seconds ago
NHL making trades right now
by Nancy Roussy
Ice Hockey
25 minutes 29 seconds ago
Astronomy ABC - H for Herschel Space Observatory
by Mona - Astronomy
Astronomy
55 minutes 2 seconds ago
What essential oil will you use today?
by Deanna - New Age
New Age
Today at 07:46 AM
Michelle’s Summer Reading Book Cover Challenge
by Deanna - New Age
Reading
Today at 07:37 AM
The Perfect Hug Book Review
by Deanna - New Age
Reading
Today at 07:33 AM
New Age / Metaphysical Quotes
by Deanna - New Age
New Age
Today at 07:29 AM
Groundhog Day Movie Question
by Deanna - New Age
Romance Movies
Today at 07:27 AM
Register to Post!
Want to post? For security reasons you need to Register as a Forum Member. It's quick, easy and free!
Forum Activities
Book Clubs
Trivia Contests
Who's Online
1 registered (Nancy Roussy), 62 Guests and 4 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Ad Income Supports Charity



| About BellaOnline | Privacy Policy | Advertising | Become an Editor |
Website copyright © 2015 Minerva WebWorks LLC. All rights reserved.