logo

Channel List
Beauty & Self
Books & Music
Career
Computers
Education
Family
Food & Wine
Health & Fitness
Hobbies & Crafts
Home & Garden
Money
News & Politics
Relationships
Religion & Spirituality
Sports
Travel & Culture
TV & Movies
Safety
We take forum safety very seriously here at BellaOnline. Please be sure to read through our Forum Guidelines. Let us know if you have any questions or comments!
Newest Members
missdeana, bettyannconte, Mary Hamlin, artalcoholic, LAVUMO
58217 Registered Users
Forum Stats
58,217 Registered Members
417 Forums
118,361 Topics
840,801 Posts

Most users ever online: 615 @ 04/22/15 10:11 AM
Top Posters (30 Days)
Nancy Roussy 266
Connie - ADD/Sandwiches/Reading 126
Mona - Astronomy 100
Lisa LowCarb / VideoGames 56
Susan Helene Kramer 31
mary-tea1 26
Angie 25
Angela - Drama Movies 20
Deanna - New Age 19
Korie - California/Yoga/Knitting Editor 15
Ad Income Supports Charity
Topic Options
#767620 - 06/11/12 10:49 AM ADV Countersues FUNimation
Lesley Aeschliman Offline
BellaOnline Editor
Wolf

Registered: 09/19/07
Posts: 5980
Loc: Enumclaw, WA, USA
Crunchyroll is reporting that as part of the lawsuit between FUNimation and ADV over ADV's disoslution and debts, ADV has decided to countersue as a third-party, claiming that FUNimation is trying to monopolize the anime industry through illegal means.

The countersuit was filed in the Harris County Courts on May 8, 2012, as an amended answer, original counterclaim and third-party claim.

The lawsuit specifies FUNimation Entertainment, FUNimation Productions Ltd., AnimeOnline Ltd., FUNimation GP LLC, Anime LP Holdings LLC., FUNimation LP LLC, and FUNimation CEO Gen Fukunaga as the defendants, and seeks judgment in favor of ADV in both the lawsuit and countersuit. In addition, the suit asks that ADV be awarded its "actual, consequential, direct, indirect, and exemplary damages"; attorney's fees, interests and court costs; and "an order enjoining FUNimation from attempting to enforce any rights it claims to have secured from ARM and from obtaining any assets owned by the defendants" of the original suit.

ADV's counterclaim claims nine reasons for the suit:
*violation of the Federal Sherman Act
*violation of the Texas Free Enterprise Act
*Unfair Competition/Misappropriation
*Tortuous Interference with Existing Contract
*Violations of Chapter 9 of the Texas Business and Commerce Code
*Conspiracy to Violate Chapter 9 of the Texas Business and Commerce Code
*Breach of Contract
*Conspiracy to Commit Fraud
*Fraud and Fraudulent Inducement

In addition, since ADV is claiming that the foreclosure sale was unlawful, they also claim that a "sham foreclosure sale" took place.
_________________________
Lesley Aeschliman

Top
#767688 - 06/11/12 03:22 PM Re: ADV Countersues FUNimation [Re: Lesley Aeschliman]
Lesley Aeschliman Offline
BellaOnline Editor
Wolf

Registered: 09/19/07
Posts: 5980
Loc: Enumclaw, WA, USA
Anime News Network is reporting that according to the Office of Harris County, the case was "removed to Federal court" on June 8, 2012, and that the office is currently listing that the case is disposed.

The site is also reporting that FUNimation filed a notice of removal on June 8, 2012 in the third-party claim.
_________________________
Lesley Aeschliman

Top
#767859 - 06/12/12 03:11 PM Re: ADV Countersues FUNimation [Re: Lesley Aeschliman]
Lesley Aeschliman Offline
BellaOnline Editor
Wolf

Registered: 09/19/07
Posts: 5980
Loc: Enumclaw, WA, USA
Anime News Network is reporting that FUNimation provided the site with the following statement in regards to ADV's countersuit:

"We believe these counterclaims are frivolous and will soon be dismissed. Funimation is obviously not a monopoly, has not sought a monopoly, and has never been in violation of any antitrust laws. Rather, these claims were brought in a transparent attempt to gain leverage in the case because the defendants lack any defense to Funimation's original claims."

In addition, Anime News Network is also reporting that FUNimation has confirmed that the case was transferred to the Federal District Court for the Southern District of Texas, Houston Division on June 8, 2012.
_________________________
Lesley Aeschliman

Top


Want to reply? Register as a Forum Member - it's quick, free and fun!
Brand New Posts
WHAT IS THE BEST JEWELRY TO WEAR
by missdeana
Fashion Jewelry
3 seconds ago
Personal style or Latest Fashion Trends?
by missdeana
Women's Fashion
5 minutes 19 seconds ago
Would you purchase fashion jewelry online?
by missdeana
Fashion Jewelry
24 minutes 19 seconds ago
What exercise did you do today?
by missdeana
Exercise
Today at 09:47 PM
Cooking perfect shrimp on a himalayan salt block!
by Stacey Marka
Hot & Spicy Food
Today at 07:57 PM
Lisa's Daily 10pm EST / 8pm MST Meditation
by Lisa LowCarb / VideoGames
Meditation
Today at 03:01 PM
Strength Training Benefits
by Teresa - Holistic Health
Holistic Health
Today at 02:59 PM
What Did You Write Today?
by Lisa LowCarb / VideoGames
Fiction Writing
Today at 01:30 PM
medieval times and women's rights
by Lisa LowCarb / VideoGames
Women's Issues
Today at 12:23 PM
Grauman's Chinese Theatre Celebrates 90th B-day
by Angela - Drama Movies
Classic Films
Today at 11:56 AM
Register to Post!
Want to post? For security reasons you need to Register as a Forum Member. It's quick, easy and free!
Forum Activities
Book Clubs
Trivia Contests
Who's Online
1 registered (missdeana), 85 Guests and 5 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Ad Income Supports Charity



| About BellaOnline | Privacy Policy | Advertising | Become an Editor |
Website copyright © 2016 Minerva WebWorks LLC. All rights reserved.