 |
 |
 |
 |
|
We take forum safety very seriously here at BellaOnline. Please be sure to read through our Forum Guidelines. Let us know if you have any questions or comments!
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
#706130 - 08/08/11 06:36 PM
Re: Reservation Mindset
[Re: Phyllis Doyle Burns]
|
BellaOnline Editor
Koala
Registered: 02/22/08
Posts: 2100
Loc: Southeast Georgia
|
Welcome vhawk and thanks for joining in. "Dependency Syndrome" that's very descriptive. I really like how the lady with the Peace Corps addresses this in Malawi.
I so hardily agree how a sense of ownership can dramatically improve communities. Recently I learned why there is no sense of ownership for many on the reservations. The reason is so disheartening.
All reservation land and improvements are held in trust, there is no individual ownership. Why would one maintain and improve something they do not own or control? For example, a family works hard at building a new house or renovating an older one. If Tribal government decides to use that property for something else, the family can be removed. This has actually happened.
Several years ago, my Mother visited Rosebud reservation in the Dakotas. All the old rusty cars and shacks, many with no electricity or plumbing were very depressing. I had to agree with her questioning why they didn't at least clean up around their homes. I didn't know how efforts towards improvement could attract attention with possible negative outcome.
You have shared a significant point within a very tangled situation that is pertinent to both privately held and tribal assets in Indian culture. It's most definitely another dichotomy, struggled with for balance.
Our culture was/is based on clans, small groups. All assets were shared and those who gave freely of their personal property held high status. History provides numerous examples of how this works well on a small scale, but fails miserably when applied to large groups, such as an entire Tribe or country. Greed can be addressed within a small group, but can proprogate unchecked in large ones.
On one hand, a sense of ownership does instill pride and care, but on the other, it contradicts our culture. Including capitalism into this tangled mix can bring out the best and the worst. Personal success, wealth, and ownership pretty much sums up the "American Dream." However, Native Americans who have achieved this for themselves may not necessarily be viewed in a positive manner by some, even when they do share freely. Tribal businesses don't entirely escape this negative opinion either.
I was talking politics with an Elder who mentioned the "Deep Pockets" of the Seminole Casino business. He was referring, unflatteringly, to individuals who had grown exceedingly wealthy from this industry. This is reminiscent of how Indian Agency staff and local vendors have been viewed since reservations were established. Distrust puts it mildly.
This is so hard for me to "wrap my brain around." The simple solution of economic development through capitalism to improve the lives of American Indians, both on the individual level and community wide is fraught with cultural complications. The more I learn, the more I understand why development of any type has taken so long to get started.
Now that it has, I wonder how long it will take for a positive sense of ownership to be reconciled and integrated into our culture. Maybe it starts with a renewed "sense of self" and cultural pride.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
Want to reply? Register as a Forum Member - it's quick, free and fun!
|
|