I have always held issue that when approaching other denominations' fora, we are expected to at least learn something about theirs, or have some primary knowlege on the subject.
Not difficult, I grant you, given that the majority of Western Buddhists grew up in a Christian country, even if their home was not practising.
I feel it would be respectful therefore if other non-Buddhists were to venture into discussions on this forum having at least accumulated a little prior rudimentary Knowlege on Buddhist practice regarding the topic in question.
Wouldn't it be nice if they did a little homework before venturing to expound their own views on the matter?
Or is that being unrealistic and overly-demanding?
And if so, why?
The reason I am pressing this point is because as a frequenter on 5 other Buddhist Fora - this is a pre-requisite of any non-Buddhist participating.
Or at least their wishing to learn something, being a condition of their joining.
What's the point of entering into a discussion and not knowing something about it?
It's a bit like my attending an avionics conference, and having no knowlege on the subject, but giving my experiences of flying to Milan on holiday.
Very interesting, yes thanks - but - what's your point, with regard to avionics?
I see your point, and in future threads that I start I will be more specific in the questions asked. However, since in this one I invited non-Buddhists to comment on how they felt about rebirth OR reincarnation, all of the posts so far are on topic, and none seem to me to be disrespectful towards Buddhism.
I also belong to another Buddhist forum, as well as an interfaith one, and they vary in approach. Because of the broad nature of BellaOnline, I think the articles and forum will always attract a lot of non-Buddhists, which is different than many other Buddhist forums, which are associated with specific Buddhist sites or sanghas. I think in the future I will have threads that are oriented for Buddhists, and some open to all.