 |
 |
 |
 |
|
We take forum safety very seriously here at BellaOnline. Please be sure to read through our Forum Guidelines. Let us know if you have any questions or comments!
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
#313685 - 05/15/07 10:07 PM
Spiritual Cookery
|
Newbie
Registered: 10/17/06
Posts: 10
|
The �spiritual quality of food� is not a metaphor: food contains a light fiber energy which is as important to our sustenance as vitamins and proteins, but which is not susceptible to chemical analysis. And just as the vitamin and protein content of food can be diminished by processing or overcooking, so too can the light fiber content of food be diminished by disrespect.
Light fibers are actually the same things as good feelings. When we feel good, we literally glow. When a food plant or animal feels good, it glows. Even when it is killed for food, the glow remains as long as the killing was done with respect; that is, with a sense of connectedness and gratitude rather than mechanically.
A farmer puts the glow into his plants and animals by treating them with respect � by respecting their feelings. Practically all farmers farm for the love it; they sure don�t do it for the money. They feel joyous as they ride their tractors up and down their fields, and that good feeling is communicated to the soil and plants. Similarly, most dairy farmers not only address their cows as individuals, but they also develop quirky personal relationships with them. Therefore, from a light fiber point of view, our vegetable and milk supplies are still relatively safe. Most egg farms, on the other hand, are run like Auschwitz, and that�s what makes eggs poisonous to eat (not their cholesterol).
Not all cultures have been so cut off from their true feelings about food as ours is today. Many Native American tribes had a deep awareness that they were a part of what they ate � e.g., the buffalo. They lived with the buffalo, followed the buffalo, prayed to the buffalo. They were one with the buffalo, and thus to them eating was a sacrament. Modern Native Americans maintain that same attitude of reverence towards maize.
(excerpted from Magical Almanac ezine, BellaOnline ALERT: Raw URLs are not allowed in these forums for security reasons. Please use UBB code. If you don't know how to do UBB code just post here for help - we will help out!
Edited by Lauren_D'Silva (05/16/07 01:55 PM)
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
#313891 - 05/16/07 11:49 AM
Re: Spiritual Cookery
[Re: Bob_Makransky]
|
Jellyfish
Registered: 02/10/07
Posts: 177
Loc: Moncks Corner, SC
|
So where did you retrieve your information for this article? Because you contradict yourself in here, saying that Nattive Americans hunted, followed, prayed to and ate the buffalo then you say that their main diet was corn. Native Americans, until invasion by Europeans and forced concentration camp style migrations, were nomadic hunters. Following whatever game was available, buffalo, deer, elk, antelope, etcetera. Alos the way you talk about eating makes me wonder if you A: aren't proliferating the American stereotype of gluttonous pigs; B: Have a secret hatred of people with weight issues; or C: have an eating problem yourself. I understand what you are trying to say, that we should be thankful for what we have to eat, go back to basics and eat less processed, organic or even home grown foods. But find me a baby that feels shame in eating cake on their 4th birthday.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
#316989 - 05/24/07 06:03 PM
Re: Spiritual Cookery
[Re: freespirit]
|
Newbie
Registered: 05/22/07
Posts: 42
Loc: Iowa
|
I need to chime in here as I am Native American and spent the first 27 years of my life on our Sett. All this past tense reference to us is a bit unnerving, as in we " used to" pray for the animal we ate and so on. This is not in the past for us - this continues! Also, the part about maize ( corn ) is not accurate in that not all tribes were growing this crop. Nor did all tribes save plains tribes follow the food. California tribes and others had fishing and other readily year-long available sources of food. Although we may not still roam looking for buffalo, many many natives still hunt the food they eat. And when we get our govt. commodity food, it is powdered milk, powdered eggs etc.,,and the old standby- Spam! So I am also confused about that being brought up jokingly. If it weren't for the commods and that Spam many elders, especially amongst the Lakotas , would die. They are starving on what is essentially a 3rd world nation ( Pine Ridge ) in the middle of America. Not trying to be a downer here, but please don't discuss my people in the past tense. We are still here, we still practice our ways.
Edited by Rueben (05/24/07 06:07 PM)
_________________________
Bye bye !
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
#317453 - 05/26/07 03:52 PM
Re: Spiritual Cookery
[Re: Botanical Bella]
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
To Hunt or Not to Hunt This was an essay posted on WitchVox. I thought that some portions of it tied in nicely to this discussion. My beef with it (pun intended) is this: The author says she couldn't hunt or fish because she couldn't stand to watch the animal die in terror. That I can understand. She goes on to say that if she were in a situation where she was forced to hunt, she still wouldn't do it. She would have someone else do it for her... That's where I start to have a problem with her argument. In my eyes, a person would have a lot more respect for the meat of choice if he/she was the one to kill it. It seems almost hypocritical to me for someone in a "hunt or die" situation to say, "Surely I'll eat the meat, but you have to use the hatchet." Going back to something I posted before, I think that we should have some sort of right-of-passage where children hunt or experience what goes into the making of meat products. I think it would make people appreciate what goes into their bodies more. And, though this lady says that she pays homage to any meat that goes into her mouth, if she actually had to go through with killing an animal to get that meat, I'll bet she would respect it even more... I heartily agree with her stance that people shouldn't hunt just for fun. If they are doing it for fun, the meat should still be utilized for good in some way. But I still find something a little off in the fact that she won't hunt under any circumstances, but will gladly eat the rewards of someone else's labors. Anyone else have any opinions on this? (Disclaimer: I have never hunted or killed anything for the meat. I have been fishing, sometimes for the meat, sometimes for the sport. I still think that if I had the opportunity, I would like to hunt once just to have the experience. I would likely be crying while dressing the critter, but I still think it is an experience people should have...)
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
Want to reply? Register as a Forum Member - it's quick, free and fun!
|
|