I agree with Mindy.

My opinion is not so common in my country...

I have a preference for male leadership.

Then may you find all the Hitlers, Bushes, Romenoffs,(sp?) Nixons and such that you seek.

Mindy,

I said preference...not any and all.

There are also Washingtons, Lincolns and Reagans too.

That's right. And you are speaking of evil men, there are many women who are equally or more evil. The point was not about evil but about do women have faith in women?

For example- you are scheduled for a sugery that may even kill you.
You can choose between two surgeons. One is man and another is a woman. Who would you prefer if both are said to be equally competent.

"Said to be equally competent"....Sometimes, we don't have a choice....Whlst I was under anaesthesia, the surgeon who was supposed to operate was called away to another emergency. Somebody completely different operated on me without my knowledge, but when you sign a consent form, it specifies particularly that the operations procedures might have to change.

I think in cases such as this, it may be impossible to comment....

But gender is of no importance to me in such a case. I would be looking at reputation, records of past procedures, competence and character. I am not counting on "said to be"...I'd investigate for myself......

You investigate and find them both to be equally competent. i am talking of logic. Logic as a subject and game theory. Here, you get data from me and you only answer. you can not change the data. So if both are equally competent, who would a woman choose? what is your predicyion if a sample of large numbers answers this question?

Why is it so important for you to have black and white answers? There are no absolutes in Life, and most observations are a generalisation..... I can't say what would always definitely be and what would never definitely be....that's impossible.
Logic in such a case cannot be the exclusive criterion.

I don't understand your fixed persistence, perhaps you could clarify.....

It is a simple question of logic to make one understand how one thinks. Simple. You are not sure about your action and that is Ok. Let me wait and find out what others say.

No, I told you what my action would be. Then you cam back in and attempted to 'move the goaql-posts' by adding the criterion of clear logic....I have noticed you have a tendency to keep coming in and changing the dynamics of your questions by adding different quantifying factors.... as with your 'three people in a boat' thread....

So I am just curious as to what your motivation is with all these quizzes....

that's all.....