logo
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 3 of 4 1 2 3 4
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 3,313
Zebra
Offline
Zebra
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 3,313
Originally Posted By: Paula, Wine,ItalianFood,Library
Firefly, you are confusing theology. The Immaculate Conception has nothing to do with the Virgin birth of Jesus.

On the contrary, it has EVERYTHING to do with it....! smile

Last edited by Alexandra; 03/08/07 04:33 AM.
Sponsored Post Advertisement
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 31
M
Newbie
Offline
Newbie
M
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 31
The Immaculate Conception is the description of how God's saving grace acted in Mary's life. It could have happened another way in order for her to be the Mother of God. The process/time was God's perogative. So, the Virgin Birth of Jesus didn't have to be connected to the Immaculate Conception.

Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 3,313
Zebra
Offline
Zebra
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 3,313
It was connected with the immaculate conception, because in order for her to have been assigned the role of Jesus' Mother, she could not have been first guilty of original sin. Her very existence and state would have ruled out the purity of Jesus' origins...That is why the Catholic Council of Rome decided that she would have to be portrayed as a virgin, born without sin. it was a human decision, not a Godly one.

Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 1,611
Chipmunk
Offline
Chipmunk
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 1,611
That's true, that concept of the conception (like that?) has to do with the idea of Mary as the pure vessel. Yet, the purity does not come from her own actions, but the grace of God working in her life. She states that God is her savior. She was conceived through normal human relations, but through the grace of God was sanctified from the moment of her conception. Catholics acknowledge this when we state, "...Mary full of grace..." She is full of the grace of God. It wasn't because she did it through her own actions. That's palagianism.


Wine Host, Italian Food, Library Sciences Host
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 5,004
Wolf
Offline
Wolf
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 5,004
Originally Posted By: Alexandra
It was connected with the immaculate conception, because in order for her to have been assigned the role of Jesus' Mother, she could not have been first guilty of original sin. Her very existence and state would have ruled out the purity of Jesus' origins...That is why the Catholic Council of Rome decided that she would have to be portrayed as a virgin, born without sin. it was a human decision, not a Godly one.


What is original sin?

Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 3,313
Zebra
Offline
Zebra
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 3,313
Original sin is according to the Roman Catholic Council of Rome, what we as humans are already born with, as a result of the fornication between our parents, and their parents, and their parents before them.....all the way back to Adam and Eve, who really fouled things up by going against God's wishes....so they were condemned to wearing clothes ("because they were ashamed of their nakedness".... this was a way to therefore put in the minds of people that a naked body is a shameful thing, and wrong in God's eyes....! I mean, I ask you!) That's how we're born, right? Right. So that makes us sinful.....And that we are charged with labouring and toiling instead of having everything handed onto a plate, to us, and that labour will be painful and distressing (God states it should be so, in the Bible!) I wonder how many hard-line fundamentalist Christian women still opt for a pain-free birth by taking painkillers during labour?....Hmmmmm....
But because of Adam and Eve's sins, all those years ago (lol) we are condemned to being born of sin.... But the RC council of Rome had to make an exception of mary, so she was decreed to not only have been born Immaculate, so she had no sin at birth, (making her a worthy vessel for The Son of God) but that she also gave birth to him, apparently never having "known" a man.

However, the Koran describes the birth of Jesus as having been painful, even though God put food and drink her way to ease her pain.... But the Bible makes no mention of her labour...in fact, it glosses over the process very lightly....

Sorry....That's a brief outline of original Sin....

'Hail mary Full of Grace' doesn't mean that she was a Virgin, or Immaculate.... In fact, nobody really knows what happened when she became pregnant, because the whole story is merely the version of what someone imagines an Angel might have said to her....because the only two people present at the time were Mary and the Angel...and as far as I know, mary was never interviewed or asked about her encounter with the angel. And she never spoke to anyone about it. So it's all heresay anyway.....

MoonShadows #301391 03/21/07 11:12 PM
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 364
BellaOnline Editor
Shark
Offline
BellaOnline Editor
Shark
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 364
Quote:
Although I was rasied Catholic I have one question about a teaching that no one seems to be able to explain to me. Why is it SO important to the Cathholic Church that Mary (the mother of Jesus) was a virgin throughout her life?


Because that is what Sacred Scripture and Sacred Tradition teaches us.

Here is a link that explains quite well why we believe in Mary's perpetual virginity:

Mary: Ever Virgin

This article also includes commentary by the early Church Fathers, as well as mentions that... "Today most Protestants are unaware of these early beliefs regarding Mary�s virginity and the proper interpretation of "the brethren of the Lord." And yet, the Protestant Reformers themselves�Martin Luther, John Calvin, and Ulrich Zwingli�honored the perpetual virginity of Mary and recognized it as the teaching of the Bible, as have other, more modern Protestants."

And here's a link that explains that the Greek word for brother (adelphos) and sister (adelphe) have a wide meaning in the Bible - and does not simply refer to the literal meaning of full siblings or half siblings:

Brethren of the Lord



Peace in Christ,


Melissa Knoblett-Aman
Catholicism Editor | Cats Editor
Alexandra #301402 03/21/07 11:31 PM
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 364
BellaOnline Editor
Shark
Offline
BellaOnline Editor
Shark
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 364
Quote:
I was given to understand by my own Catholic Priest that as far as he had understood and been taught, Jesus DID have siblings.
When I incredulously asked - "REALLY??!?" he responded - "Yes. Why not?"


That really surprises me since Mary's perpetual virginity has always been the teaching of the Church.

Quote:
My main gripe about all of this is - why did Joseph suddenly drop off the edge of the map?
He sacrificed so much and did all he could to be a suitable father to God Incarnate. I am more than a little miffed, on his behalf, tht his role seems to have been sidelined and relegated to one of a second-rate support....
Whatever happened to him?


I've never thought of Joseph's role as second-rate. It's believed that he was older than Mary and probably died before Jesus' adult ministry. And if he had been alive it doesn't make sense that he wouldn't have been mentioned in the gospels.



Peace in Christ,


Melissa Knoblett-Aman
Catholicism Editor | Cats Editor
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 3,313
Zebra
Offline
Zebra
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 3,313
Originally Posted By: Melissa KA
Quote:
I was given to understand by my own Catholic Priest that as far as he had understood and been taught, Jesus DID have siblings.
When I incredulously asked - "REALLY??!?" he responded - "Yes. Why not?"


That really surprises me since Mary's perpetual virginity has always been the teaching of the Church.


BellaOnline ALERT: Raw URLs are not allowed in these forums for security reasons. Please use UBB code. If you don't know how to do UBB code just post here for help - we will help out!

MoonShadows #348861 10/20/07 11:25 PM
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 3
D
Newbie
Offline
Newbie
D
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 3
Regarding Mary setting impossible standards for women today with regards to healthy sexuality, today on EWTN Radio I heard an interview of Christopher West. He's been very involved in "translating" some of Pope John Paul II's work on "Love and Responsibility" and "Theology of the Body." Anyway, he has written a new book, and, I'm sorry to say I don't remember the title. What Christopher was talking about was an old heresy from a few years after the Church's beginning (a few hundred). It said that spirit is good, body is bad. People had the idea that our bodies, and any of the natural things that go along with our bodies, were sinful. They believed we were to live "above our bodies," in the Spiritual realm, and even have contempt for our bodies.

He talked about how John Paul II told us that our bodies are sacred, as well as our spirits. We are made in the image and likeness of God, remember. Adam and Eve did not hide their "private" body parts, out of shame, until they had sinned.

I believe what Christopher was saying; that is, that we cannot separate body and soul (or spirit) in this life. When we are in a blessed marital union, our sexuality is a huge gift from God. Becoming one with Christ, and becoming one with one's spouse IN Christ includes sexual intercourse. Natural Family Planning also teaches that, by becoming closer to our bodies and the miracles that they are, we women can learn when we might conceive, and either use that time to try to conceive (God willing - that's His business if we do), or to abstain for awhile in prayer, and avoid intercourse. Husbands are involved by keeping the records in writing on forms/charts provided. Husband and wife talk about the most intimate functionings of her body, and his body is involved, also.

Sorry if this is too long. I just think that John Paul II gave the Church a great gift by his writings about this. Mary was a virgin when she became pregnant, and made an agreement to remain chaste throughout her life, and evidently Jospeph did, as well. That was not so unusual in their times.

Hope this helps. I want to read Christopher West's new book!
Deb


A person can never have too many books.
Page 3 of 4 1 2 3 4

Moderated by  Melissa-Catholicism/Cats 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Brand New Posts
Psalm for the day
by Angie - 05/03/24 09:25 AM
Moisturizing Winter Skin the Right Way
by gigi333 - 05/03/24 01:58 AM
Inspiration Quote
by Angie - 05/01/24 04:43 PM
2024 - on this day in the past ...
by Mona - Astronomy - 05/01/24 01:09 PM
Springtime Sewing Projects
by Cheryl - Sewing Editor - 05/01/24 10:57 AM
Astro Women - Birthdays
by Mona - Astronomy - 04/28/24 05:54 PM
Review of Boost Your Online Brand: Make Creative A
by Digital Art and Animation - 04/25/24 07:04 PM
Mother's Day Gift Ideas to Sew
by Cheryl - Sewing Editor - 04/24/24 06:08 PM
Check Out My New Website Selective Focus
by Angela - Drama Movies - 04/24/24 01:47 PM
Sew a Garden Flag
by Cheryl - Sewing Editor - 04/17/24 01:24 PM
Sponsor
Safety
We take forum safety very seriously here at BellaOnline. Please be sure to read through our Forum Guidelines. Let us know if you have any questions or comments!
Privacy
This forum uses cookies to ensure smooth navigation from page to page of a thread. If you choose to register and provide your email, that email is solely used to get your password to you and updates on any topics you choose to watch. Nothing else. Ask with any questions!


| About BellaOnline | Privacy Policy | Advertising | Become an Editor |
Website copyright © 2022 Minerva WebWorks LLC. All rights reserved.


Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5