I read the article with interest. A portion of the article states:
...Goodwin said her supervisor told her she was "a joke" at the university's main library, where she "was seen merely as a pretty girl who wore sexy outfits, low cut blouses, and tight pants."...
If this is what Ms. Goodwin's supervisor said to her, her race does not seem to be an issue here, rather it is incidental.
[Harvard spokesperson]Wrinn noted that Goodwin's case was dismissed by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission and the Massachusetts Commission Against Discrimination.
I worked for university legal counsel for 25 years and I can tell you that the EEOC does not leave a stone unturned when they come after you <img src="/images/graemlins/frown.gif" alt="" /> If they dismissed the case, my guess is she should not have tried to make a case based on 'black and pretty'. However, I do believe that there is probably some prejudice on the part of Harvard concerning the way she dressed, especially in her role as librarian. Unfortunately, women are still judged by the way they dress. To some dressing sexy often means "brainless bimbo" or "easy to bed". This is not the standard 'librarian' picture we have in our heads. You do have to dress appropriately for your job.