 |
 |
 |
 |
|
We take forum safety very seriously here at BellaOnline. Please be sure to read through our Forum Guidelines. Let us know if you have any questions or comments!
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
#176506 - 10/28/04 08:07 AM
Re: Thoughts on medical terminology
|
Newbie
Registered: 10/24/04
Posts: 3
Loc: London
|
Unfortunately, the experiences described in the earlier replies seem to be somewhat universal, and it is time that we changed the awareness of doctors, midwives and other medical staff. Recently, I came across an article in a London newspaper about a memorial service in a hospital for all parents who had suffered miscarriage and baby loss. I thought for a moment, finally, somebody has put some thought into providing a meaningful ritual/facility, when I read further, and it said: ...'for those who have suffered miscarriage after 4 months and lost their baby at birth'... How is that supposed to make parents feel, who suffered from miscarriage at an earlier state? They are also excluded from all NHS counselling. The NHS does not recognize at all the physcial and psychological scarring and strain on both parents.
_________________________
Ziggy Agocsi, Principal, World Academy for Interdisciplinary Training featuring S.A.M. Voicework
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
#176510 - 04/05/05 06:02 PM
Re: Thoughts on medical terminology
|
Newbie
Registered: 03/30/05
Posts: 2
|
I just had my D&C yesterday. We had an "incomplete" miscarriage last week, and I'm glad that I took a few days to grieve and accept the situation before electing to have the surgery. I was much calmer and prepared than if I had rushed in for the procedure. It did not feel like the doctors were taking my baby out--I had had adequate time to grieve for that loss already and felt as if the doctor was helping to give me a clean slate for my next try. The process was quick, painless and everyone at the Hospital were supportive and kind. My husband was great, and I already feel TONS better today. I can actually feel my hormone levels returning to normal, and I feel much more healthy and cleansed by the experience.
I don't mean to gloss over the terrible feelings and sense of loss that we felt--having to have surgery after losing a baby seems like adding insult to injury, especially since you have to go to the hospital and be put under anesthesia. I was anxious about the procedure--it seemed so invasive and cold. I still feel this way, but after having undergone it, I see that it is healthy and necessary, and if you have a good doctor as I did, the process can be positive.
Best of luck, and please don't worry too much. It was hard, but quick, and I survived!
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
#176511 - 04/13/05 06:56 PM
Re: Thoughts on medical terminology
|
Newbie
Registered: 04/13/05
Posts: 2
|
I hope this won't offend anyone. I myself went through 2 miscarriages. The last one being just last month. I happened upon this thread when looking up info on Curves for Women (and found it, but continued browsing).
I defintely do not invalidate how you feel about terminology used. That is your response and of course you are entitled to it. Might I say, though, that you might have spared yourself the negative or emotional reaction if you understood that facts and medical terms? "Miscarriage" is actually the "politically correct" term that came AFTER the long use of the term "abortion." In the older days, abortion just simply meant when the fetus didn't carry to term. Then then a spontaneous one meant it just happened, a missed/incomplete one meant it happened but there is still "products of conception" (another technical term I learned associated with my miscarriage) left. Threatened abortion means, well, a miscarriage is imminent. Then there is elective abortion, to mean what we think the plain term "abortion" mean.
I don't think the medical professionals in any way intend on being insensitive. I think in order that they are not wrapped up with the emotions of your loss with you (not really knowing how everyone feels about it). I think they have a hard job...and the only way they can stay neutral is to remain neutral in their use of terminology. Frankly, I'd rather leave the handholding by those who are better trained to handle my grief....like a counselor.
I went back for an ultrasound after not one but two D&C's because the first one wasn't a "clean" job. When the technician asked me what the ultrasound was for I tried to explain that the D&C wasn't clean and that not all of the ___ came out. I drew a blank on that ___. What do I call it? Not a baby, not fetus....ah, the tech said "products of conception." I think they actually do try to sound technical to protect you from being emotional.
While on the topic -- none of the physicians at both miscarriages ever "diagnosed" or called the situation a "miscarriage." They called it as it was -- no fetal hearbeat in one case and "no fetal movement" in the other. You figure out what that means..... I think they are just trained to state the objective facts.
Yes, not the most "sensitive" to say but then again, I leave the counseling to the counselors.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
#474447 - 12/10/08 12:51 AM
Re: Thoughts on medical terminology
[Re: Ahvee]
|
Shark
Registered: 04/29/07
Posts: 312
Loc: Mississippi USA
|
Good doctors and other medical professionals use medical terminology but should be attuned to patient sensibilities and perceptions. Those with good people skills will also explain or "translate" things into terms the average person can understand. Certainly, if a patient does not understand something, the patient should feel entitled to ask for further explanation.
It would be unwise to ask medical professionals to use only common, non-medical terminology. Ultimately, the medical terminology they use goes into their written reports, and patients are entitled to know that terminology. Of course, the reports MUST contain standard medical terminology which is vital because these records need to be shareable by other professionals. Standardizing medical terminology has always been vital to insuring clear reports.
Having worked in the medical field for several years, I can attest to the FACT that 'abortion' is the medical term for miscarriage. It simply refers to the natural process the body goes through in the unfortunate event that a fetus needs to be expelled. It was a term used before clinical abortions were ever performed--way before "abortion" was a hot-button issue.
As for opting out of a D&C when products of conception are retained, I would personally be afraid to do that. Only about 100 years ago, complications of childbirth were the leading cause of death among women. Retaining products of conception was an extremely dangerous thing for women. Anything left behind had the potential to become a perfect environment for deadly infection--and I do mean deadly. (Talk about a painful death!) Granted, there are women whose bodies expell the material over time; but, normally, if everything is not expelled at the time of miscarriage or birth, a D&C can insure that nothing is left to set up infection. In the "olden" days, we did not have D&Cs, and there were no antibiotics!
One thing my clinic did for women who miscarried was to give each one a book on dealing with the grief of losing a baby. I believe the doctors gave out this book before the patients left the hospital. I thought this was a very nice gesture, and we definitely heard from patients who appreciated it. I'm sorry I do not remember the title. Losing a baby at any stage of development is definitely a difficult, tragic thing for most women (and their partners) to accept, so, the emotional side of things really needs to be acknowledged by the medical professionals.
Ironically, in this age of pro-choice, we see people blithely undergoing clinical abortions while others experience "natural" abortions as a solemn, sad event. The clinic I worked in refused to do clinical abortions. Its doctors had a pro-life practice without making an issue of it. Unfortunately, there are forces that would, if they could, insist that all ob-gyns offer clinical abortions regardless of their personal beliefs. Also, the grief book I mentioned took the stance that there is a God. That stance also draws a lot of fire. Sometimes, if someone (a doctor or whoever) offers us some compassion or comfort, we should just accept it whether or not we think their words perfectly align with our personal belief systems. I think we can inhibit people's following their good instincts when we reject their seemingly awkward attempts at communicating compassion.
_________________________
cela
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
Want to reply? Register as a Forum Member - it's quick, free and fun!
|
|